You can have ports from different tenants in a network. It's an admin-only capability unless the network is marked as "shared".
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Varun Lodaya <[email protected]> wrote: > Adding the right subject line. > > From: Varun Lodaya <[email protected]> > Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 2:26 PM > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > [email protected]> > Subject: port-create with network from a different tenant does not fail > > Hi, > > We were seeing this issue where if the user role is admin in 2 tenants A > and B and he issues neutron port-create <network-id> in tenant A where > <network-id> is in tenant B, it ends up creating that port. Ideally, it > should have failed since you cannot have the port/network in different > tenants. > > varunlodaya@ubuntu:~/devstack$ neutron port-show > fc6917ea-0c0c-4ec5-9202-4441701c9984 > > +-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | Field | Value > | > > +-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | admin_state_up | True > | > | allowed_address_pairs | > | > | binding:host_id | > | > | binding:profile | {} > | > | binding:vif_details | {} > | > | binding:vif_type | unbound > | > | binding:vnic_type | normal > | > | device_id | > | > | device_owner | > | > | extra_dhcp_opts | > | > | fixed_ips | {"subnet_id": > "8c9f5682-daf8-40e1-9b6a-57cfed7f024c", "ip_address": "10.1.1.13"} | > | id | fc6917ea-0c0c-4ec5-9202-4441701c9984 > | > | mac_address | fa:16:3e:18:6e:95 > | > | name | > | > | network_id | 0036a345-35ea-42c8-a66c-f9831d0a03a5 > | > | security_groups | 45786089-d53f-4eec-8be6-cb49766e55c1 > | > | status | DOWN > | > | tenant_id | d0d1e6e21268418b8888b0adcea413a3 > | > > +-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > varunlodaya@ubuntu:~/devstack$ neutron net-show > 0036a345-35ea-42c8-a66c-f9831d0a03a5 > +---------------------------+--------------------------------------+ > | Field | Value | > +---------------------------+--------------------------------------+ > | admin_state_up | True | > | id | 0036a345-35ea-42c8-a66c-f9831d0a03a5 | > | name | alt_private | > | provider:network_type | vxlan | > | provider:physical_network | | > | provider:segmentation_id | 1003 | > | router:external | False | > | shared | False | > | status | ACTIVE | > | subnets | 8c9f5682-daf8-40e1-9b6a-57cfed7f024c | > | tenant_id | 099bfd6e59434b51a479ab7142ff01df | > +---------------------------+--------------------------------------+ > varunlodaya@ubuntu:~/devstack$ > > > Is this an expected behavior or a known bug? Should I create a new one? > > Thanks, > Varun > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -- Kevin Benton
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
