Hi, I do not think that that is a healthy solution. That effectively would render a cluster down if the compute node goes down. That would be a real disaster. The ugly work around is setting the host names to be the same value. This is something that we should discuss at the next summit and I would hope to propose a topic to talk about. Thanks Gary
On 2/11/15, 5:31 PM, "Matthew Booth" <[email protected]> wrote: >I just posted this: > >https://review.openstack.org/#/c/154907/ > >as an alternative fix for critical bug: > >https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1419785 > >I've just knocked this up quickly for illustration: it obviously needs >plenty of cleanup. I have confirmed that it works, though. > >Before I take it any further, though, I'd like to get some feedback on >the approach. I prefer this to the alternative, because the underlying >problem is deeper than supporting evacuate. I'd prefer to be honest with >the user and just say it ain't gonna work. The alternative would leave >Nova running in a broken state, leaving inconsistent state in its wake >as it runs. > >Matt > >-- >Matthew Booth >Red Hat Engineering, Virtualisation Team > >Phone: +442070094448 (UK) >GPG ID: D33C3490 >GPG FPR: 3733 612D 2D05 5458 8A8A 1600 3441 EA19 D33C 3490 > >__________________________________________________________________________ >OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
