Hi,

Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> +1 to fix Oslo's service module any ways, irrespective of this bug.

By the way, the Service class is a blocker point for the implementation of 
asyncio and threads specs:

   https://review.openstack.org/#/c/153298/
   https://review.openstack.org/#/c/156711/

We may allow to execute a function before fork() to explicitly share some 
things with all child processes. But most things (instanciate the application, 
open DB connections, etc.) should be done after the fork.

Well, it looks like everyone agree. We just need someone to implement the idea 
:-)

We may write a new class instead of modifying the existing class, to not break 
applications. Doug Hellamnn even proposed once to have an abstraction of the 
concurrency model (eventlet, threads, asyncio). I don't know if it's worth it.

Victor

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to