On 18:49 Thu 19 Feb , John Griffith wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Clark Boylan <cboy...@sapwetik.org> wrote: <snip> > > For open source projects that don't require special hardware we have > > wanted more people to cooperate with Infra to run tests upstream. Third > > party CI is a great solution for when you cannot redistribute certain > > pieces of software or specific hardware is required. But in general if > > it is open source and we can test it in our clouds then we would at > > least like to talk about doing it that way. > > Fair enough, I wasn't aware that this was the direction we had taken. > I certainly agree with the need for other ways to help out Open Source > projects. My only concern in this case was that I know there has been > a lot of work by first Duncan and now Mike to try and keep track of > and communicate driver testing efforts. This sort of came out of > nowhere for me personally and a number of other people on the Cinder > team. If nothing else it would just be good to know what efforts are > in progress. For the record I have no issue with the SheepDog driver > (well assuming it's up to date now; it had fallen pretty far behind as > of Juno). That's the sort of thing that I think does impact Cinder, > verifying the project is actually active in Cinder, that there's some > visible maintenance and that it actually "works". Granted that would > be sorted out soon enough just by the process itself I suppose.
<snip> Ceph, Gluster and SheepDog maintainers have been in contact with me about progress, and including me on these reviews. I was also not aware of the assistance being given to Open Source solutions, but makes sense to me. -- Mike Perez __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev