On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Johannes Erdfelt <johan...@erdfelt.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote:
> > Agree on the pain of maintaining milestone plans though, which is why I
> > propose we get rid of most of it in Liberty. That will actually be
> > discussed at the cross-project meeting today:
> >
> >
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Release_Cycle_Management/Liberty_Tracking
>
> I'm happy to see this.
>

++


>
> "Assignees may target their blueprint to a future milestone, as an
> indication of when they intend to land it (not mandatory)"
>
> That seems useless to me. I have no control over when things land. I can
> only control when my code is put up for review.
>
> Recently, I have spent a lot more time waiting on reviews than I have
> spent writing the actual code.
>

I think this is a symptom of a much deeper problem. And adjusting the
release cadence won't make a big impact on this.


>
> JE
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to