On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> wrote: > On 02/24/2015 03:28 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: > > On Feb 24, 2015, at 1:49 PM, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> wrote: > > > >>> IMHO the CLI should have an option to returned raw JSON back instead of > >>> pretty tabled results as well. > >> > >> Um... isn't that just the API calls? > >> > >> I'm not sure creating a 3rd functional surface is really the answer > >> here, because we still need to actually test the CLI / pretty table > output. > > > > The python-openstacksdk project was originally envisioned to wrap the > API calls and return usable Python objects. The nova client CLI (or any > other CLI, for that matter) would then just provide the command line input > parsing and output presentation. It's been a while since I was involved > with that project, but it seems that decoupling the command line interface > from the Python API wrapper would make testing much, much easier. > > Right, I think to some degree novaclient is legacy code, and we should > focus on specific regressions and bugs without doing to much code change. > > The future should be more focussed on openstacksdk and openstackclient. >
While I don't disagree with this, it seems like we have been waiting for openstackclient and openstacksdk for a while now, do we even have a timeline for moving off of novaclient? > > -Sean > > -- > Sean Dague > http://dague.net > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
