Maybe I'm misreading review.o.o, but I don't see the -2. There was a -2 from 
Salvatore Orlando with the comment "The -2 on this patch is only to deter 
further comments" and a link to 140292, but 140292 has a comment from Kyle 
saying it's been abandoned in favor of going back to 96149. Are we in a loop 

We're moving forward internally with proprietary mechanisms for attaching 
analyzers but it sure would be nice if there were a standard API. Anybody who 
thinks switches don't need SPAN/mirror ports has probably never working in 
Operations on a real production network where SLAs were taken seriously and 

I know there's been a lot of heated discussion around this spec for a variety 
of reasons, but there isn't an enterprise class hardware switch on the market 
that doesn't support SPAN/mirror. Lack of this capability is a glaring omission 
in Neutron that keeps Operations type folks opposed to using it because it 
causes them to lose visibility that they've had for ages. We're getting a lot 
of pressure to continue deploying hardware analyzers and/or deploy 
non-OpenStack mechanisms for implementing tap/SPAN/mirror capability when I'd 
much rather integrate the analyzers into OpenStack.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kyle Mestery (Code Review) [] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 17:37
To: vinay yadhav
Cc: CARVER, PAUL; Marios Andreou; Sumit Naiksatam; Anil Rao; Carlos Gonçalves; 
YAMAMOTO Takashi; Ryan Moats; Pino de Candia; Isaku Yamahata; Tomoe Sugihara; 
Stephen Wong; Kanzhe Jiang; Bao Wang; Bob Melander; Salvatore Orlando; Armando 
Migliaccio; Mohammad Banikazemi; mark mcclain; Henry Gessau; Adrian Hoban; 
Hareesh Puthalath; Subrahmanyam Ongole; Fawad Khaliq; Baohua Yang; Maruti 
Kamat; Stefano Maffulli 'reed'; Akihiro Motoki; ijw-ubuntu; Stephen Gordon; 
Rudrajit Tapadar; Alan Kavanagh; Zoltán Lajos Kis
Subject: Change in openstack/neutron-specs[master]: Introducing Tap-as-a-Service

Kyle Mestery has abandoned this change.

Change subject: Introducing Tap-as-a-Service


This review is > 4 weeks without comment and currently blocked by a core 
reviewer with a -2. We are abandoning this for now. Feel free to reactivate the 
review by pressing the restore button and contacting the reviewer with the -2 
on this review to ensure you address their concerns.

To view, visit
To unsubscribe, visit

Gerrit-MessageType: abandon
Gerrit-Change-Id: I087d9d2a802ea39c02259f17d2b8c4e2f6d8d714
Gerrit-PatchSet: 8
Gerrit-Project: openstack/neutron-specs
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: vinay yadhav <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Adrian Hoban <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Akihiro Motoki <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alan Kavanagh <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Anil Rao <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Armando Migliaccio <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Bao Wang <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Baohua Yang <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Bob Melander <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Carlos Gonçalves <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Fawad Khaliq <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Hareesh Puthalath <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Henry Gessau <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Isaku Yamahata <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kanzhe Jiang <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kyle Mestery <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Marios Andreou <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Maruti Kamat <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Mohammad Banikazemi <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Paul Carver <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Pino de Candia <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Rudrajit Tapadar <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Ryan Moats <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Salvatore Orlando <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Stefano Maffulli 'reed' <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Stephen Gordon <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Stephen Wong <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Subrahmanyam Ongole <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Sumit Naiksatam <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Tomoe Sugihara <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Welcome, new contributor!
Gerrit-Reviewer: YAMAMOTO Takashi <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Zoltán Lajos Kis <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: ijw-ubuntu <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: mark mcclain <>
Gerrit-Reviewer: vinay yadhav <>
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Reply via email to