On 2015-02-25 17:02:34 +0530 (+0530), Deepak Shetty wrote: [...] > Run 2) We removed glusterfs backend, so Cinder was configured with > the default storage backend i.e. LVM. We re-created the OOM here > too > > So that proves that glusterfs doesn't cause it, as its happening > without glusterfs too.
Well, if you re-ran the job on the same VM then the second result is potentially contaminated. Luckily this hypothesis can be confirmed by running the second test on a fresh VM in Rackspace. > The VM (22.214.171.124) is now in such a bad shape that existing > ssh sessions are no longer responding for a long long time now, > tho' ping works. So need someone to help reboot/restart the VM so > that we can collect the logs for records. Couldn't find anyone > during apac TZ to get it reboot. [...] According to novaclient that instance was in a "shutoff" state, and so I had to nova reboot --hard to get it running. Looks like it's back up and reachable again now. > So from the above we can conclude that the tests are running fine > on hpcloud and not on rax provider. Since the OS (centos7) inside > the VM across provider is same, this now boils down to some issue > with rax provider VM + centos7 combination. This certainly seems possible. > Another data point I could gather is: > The only other centos7 job we have is > check-tempest-dsvm-centos7 and it does not run full tempest > looking at the job's config it only runs smoke tests (also > confirmed the same with Ian W) which i believe is a subset of > tests only. Correct, so if we confirm that we can't successfully run tempest full on CentOS 7 in both of our providers yet, we should probably think hard about the implications on yesterday's discussion as to whether to set the smoke version gating on devstack and devstack-gate changes. > So that brings to the conclusion that probably cinder-glusterfs CI > job (check-tempest-dsvm-full-glusterfs-centos7) is the first > centos7 based job running full tempest tests in upstream CI and > hence is the first to hit the issue, but on rax provider only Entirely likely. As I mentioned last week, we don't yet have any voting/gating jobs running on the platform as far as I can tell, so it's still very much in an experimental stage. -- Jeremy Stanley __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev