Hi Danny, ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Danny Al-Gaaf" <danny.al-g...@bisect.de> > To: "Deepak Shetty" <dpkshe...@gmail.com> > Cc: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <email@example.com>, > ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org > Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2015 3:05:46 PM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila > ... > Another level of indirection. I really like the approach of filesystem > passthrough ... the only critical question is if virtfs/p9 is still > supported in some way (and the question if not: why?).
That "only" seems to be a biggie, isn't it? We -- Red Hat -- considered a similar, virtfs based driver for GlusterFS but we dropped that plan exactly for virtfs being abandonware. As far as I know it was meant to be a research project, and providing a fairly well working POC it was concluded -- but Deepak knows more of the story. What's your take on it? I'm really curious if there is any chance for a positive answer. Cheers, Csaba __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev