Am 04.03.2015 um 15:18 schrieb Csaba Henk: > Hi Danny, > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Danny Al-Gaaf" <[email protected]> >> To: "Deepak Shetty" <[email protected]> >> Cc: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" >> <[email protected]>, >> [email protected] >> Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2015 3:05:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila >> > ... >> Another level of indirection. I really like the approach of filesystem >> passthrough ... the only critical question is if virtfs/p9 is still >> supported in some way (and the question if not: why?). > > That "only" seems to be a biggie, isn't it?
Yes, it is. > We -- Red Hat -- considered a similar, virtfs based driver for GlusterFS > but we dropped that plan exactly for virtfs being abandonware. > > As far as I know it was meant to be a research project, and providing > a fairly well working POC it was concluded -- but Deepak knows more of > the story. Would like to understand why it was abandoned. I see the need of filesystem passthrough in the area of virtualization. Is there another solution available? Danny __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
