I'd prefer 1400 as well. But "A Foolish Consistency is the Hobgoblin of Little Minds"
- Erno > -----Original Message----- > From: Nikhil Komawar [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 11 March 2015 20:40 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Proposal to change Glance meeting > time. > > I'd prefer to go with 1400 UTC unless there's a majority for 1500UTC. > > P.S. It's my feeling that ML announcements and conversations are not > effective when taking poll from wider audience so we'd discuss this a bit > more in the next meeting and merge the votes. > > Thanks, > -Nikhil > > ________________________________________ > From: Louis Taylor <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 10:34 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Proposal to change Glance meeting > time. > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 02:25:26PM +0000, Ian Cordasco wrote: > > I have no opinions on the matter. Either 1400 or 1500 work for me. I > > think there are a lot of people asking for it to be at 1500 instead though. > > Would anyone object to changing it to 1500 instead (as long as it is > > one consistent time for the meeting)? > > I have no problem with that. I'm +1 on a consistent time, but don't mind > when it is. > > __________________________________________________________ > ________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev- > [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
