>________________________________________ >From: Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> >Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 9:09 AM >To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org >Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [stacktach] [oslo] stachtach -> kombu -> pika ?? > >On 03/10/2015 12:56 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: >> I saw the following on >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-rabbit-queue and was wondering >> if there was more explanation of why? >> >> The StackTach team is switching from Kombu to Pika (at the >> recommendation of core rabbitmq devs). Hopefully oslo-messaging will do >> the same. >> >> I'm wondering why/what? >> >> Pika seems to be less supported, has less support for things other than >> rabbitmq, and seems less developed (it lacks python 3.3 support >> apparently). > >So, something that came up was the supporting anything other MQ system >than Rabbit seemed irrelevant to the operator community. Rabbit is bad, >all others are demonstrably worse. Anything that makes the Rabbit path >better is good, anything that could regress the Rabbit path for the sake >of any of the other backends is bad (and also not useful to deployers).
True, and supporting Pika doesn't have to mean dumping Kombu. It could just be a new driver. If Pika gives better stability or performance to the most popular OpenStack MQ perhaps it's something to consider? __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
