On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:59:19AM -0700, Joe Gordon wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 3:09 AM, Daniel P. Berrange <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 08:33:26AM +0100, Thomas Herve wrote: > > > > Interesting bug. I think I agree with you that there isn't a good > > solution > > > > currently for instances that have a mix of shared and not-shared > > storage. > > > > > > > > I'm curious what Daniel meant by saying that marking the disk > > shareable is > > > > not > > > > as reliable as we would want. > > > > > > I think this is the bug I reported here: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1376615 > > > > > > My initial approach was indeed to mark the disks are shareable: the > > patch (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/125616/) has comments around the > > issues, mainly around I/Ocache and SELinux isolation being disabled. > > > > Yep, those are both show stopper issues. The only solution is to fix the > > libvirt API for this first. > > > > Thanks for the clarification, is there a bug tracking this in libvirt > already?
Actually I don't think there is one, so feel free to file one Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
