Mike,
Looks like this removal may have been a mistake. We should readdress.
Jay
On 03/20/2015 05:59 AM, Erlon Cruz wrote:
I agree with John (comment on the mentioned patchset). Also, I
expected one change removing all drivers that does not report on CI.
There's one of us (HUSDriver) that is not maintained and also should
be deprecated/removed.
Liu, the best argument here would be a report from your CI in this
patch saying it fails.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:13 PM, liuxinguo <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Mike,
I have seen the patch at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165990/
saying that huawei driver will be removed because “the maintainer
does not have a CI reporting to ensure their driver integration is
successful”.
But in fact we really have a CI months ago and it is really
reporting to reviews, the most resently posts are:
*https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165796/
Post time:2015-3-19 0:14:56
*https://review.openstack.org/#/c/164697/
Post time: 2015-3-18 23:55:37
*https://review.openstack.org/164702/
Post time: 2015-3-18 23:55:37
*https://review.openstack.org/#/c/152401/
Post time: 3-18 23:08:45
And if you want, I will give you more proof of reviews.
Thanks and regards,
Liu
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
[email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
<http://[email protected]?subject:unsubscribe>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
