On 04/03/2015 08:55 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: > I am looking forward to the Liberty cycle and seeing the special > casing we do for SQLite in our migrations (and elsewhere). My > inclination is that we should (similar to the deprecation of > eventlet) deprecate support for SQLite in Keystone. In Liberty we > will have a full functional test suite that can (and will) be used to > validate everything against much more real environments instead of > in-process “eventlet-like” test-keystone-services; the “Restful test > cases” will no longer be part of the standard unit tests (as they are > functional testing). With this change I’m inclined to say SQLite > (being the non-production usable DB) what it is we should look at > dropping migration support for SQLite and the custom work-arounds. > > Most deployers and developers (as far as I know) use devstack and > MySQL or Postgres to really suss out DB interactions. > > I am looking for feedback from the community on the general stance > for SQLite, and more specifically the benefit (if any) of supporting > it in Keystone.
Killstabstabstabdiekillkill (yes please) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
