On 08/04/15 08:59 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2015-04-07 10:43:30 +1200:On 7 April 2015 at 05:11, Joe Gordon <joe.gord...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Dolph Mathews <dolph.math...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Boris Pavlovic <bo...@pavlovic.me> wrote: >>> >>> Jay, >>> >>> >>>> Not far, IMHO. 100ms difference in startup time isn't something we >>>> should spend much time optimizing. There's bigger fish to fry. >>> >>> >>> I agree that priority of this task shouldn't be critical or even high, >>> and that there are other places that can be improved in OpenStack. >>> >>> In other hand this one is as well big source of UX issues that we have in >>> OpenStack.. >>> >>> For example: >>> >>> 1) You would like to run some command X times where X is pretty big >>> (admins likes to do this via bash loops). If you can execute all of them for >>> 1 and not 10 minutes you will get happier end user. >> >> >> +1 I'm fully in support of this effort. Shaving 100ms off the startup time >> of a frequently used library means that you'll save that 100ms over and >> over, adding up to a huge win. >> > > > Another data point on how slow our libraries/CLIs can be: > > $ time openstack -h > <snip> > real 0m2.491s > user 0m2.378s > sys 0m0.111spbr should be snappy - taking 100ms to get the version is wrong.I have always considered pbr a packaging/installation time tool, and not something that would be used at runtime. Why are we using pbr to get the version of an installed package, instead of asking pkg_resources?
Just wanted to +1 the above. I've also considered pbr a packaging/install tool. Furthermore, I believe having it as a runtime requirement makes packagers life more complicated because that means pbr will obviously need to be added as a runtime requirement for that package. Flavio
Doug-Rob__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-- @flaper87 Flavio Percoco
pgpxE4YrjG7Mt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev