On 20 April 2015 at 22:10, Victor Stinner <vstin...@redhat.com> wrote: >> If there's nothing majorly wrong mid-L, I'd like to release 1.0.0 just >> to get us into 'ok its stable' mentality. > > I read that many packages modify the source code of libraries and > applications to avoid a dependency to pbr at runtime. What's the status of > this issue? Is pbr still used/required to get the version of a package a > runtime?
I believe Redhat patch it out. I don't think they should need to, since we have explicit knobs for distros to use. There is a raised concern about performance from the keystone CLI thread, but I've not seen any followup to confirm that it was indeed testing an *installed* CLI, not one running out of git. > I'm not sure that it's an issue in pbr itself. Maybe applications should be > fixed instead. I don't think its a bug in the applications. Maybe someone from RedHat can file a bug on pbr describing what goes wrong? -Rob -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
