On 25 April 2015 at 00:11, Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 04/24/2015 07:21 AM, Amrith Kumar wrote: >> We had a hypothesis about why +0 was rarely used (never conclusively >> proved). Our hypothesis was that since Stackalytics didn't count +0's >> it led to an increased propensity to -1 something. It would be >> wonderful if we could try the experiment of giving credit for 0's and >> seeing if it changes behavior. > > I think this makes a lot of sense. These stats really do drive > behavior. I'd certainly be open to a patch to reviewstats [1] to count > +0 comments and I think it would be good for stackalytics to consider > the same. > > [1] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/reviewstats
IIRC the limit was gerrit, not reviewstats, and we've not revisited since the gerrit upgrade. -Rob -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev