On 04/24/2015 07:11 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 04/24/2015 07:21 AM, Amrith Kumar wrote:
>> We had a hypothesis about why +0 was rarely used (never conclusively
>> proved). Our hypothesis was that since Stackalytics didn't count +0's
>> it led to an increased propensity to -1 something. It would be
>> wonderful if we could try the experiment of giving credit for 0's and
>> seeing if it changes behavior.
> 
> I think this makes a lot of sense.  These stats really do drive
> behavior.  I'd certainly be open to a patch to reviewstats [1] to count
> +0 comments and I think it would be good for stackalytics to consider
> the same.
> 
> [1] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/reviewstats
> 

I actually looked at doing this a while ago, but unfortunately the json
data we were getting from Gerrit didn't include no scores.  That may
have been pre-Gerrit upgrade so it's possible it will have changed, but
it's worth noting that we may just not have the ability to track this.

-Ben

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to