The subnet_id on the pool specifies what networks to plug when everything is 
first configured.Iif you add a member to the pool that is outside this subnet, 
there may not be a route to it, since it is probably on a different network 
that is not correctly plugged on the LB host. (I hope this is correct, it is 
from memory from a bit ago.)

--Adam

https://keybase.io/rm_you


From: Wanjing Xu <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List not for usage questions 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 5:15 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List not for usage questions 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Why do we need to select subnet 
when creating a pool?

Thanks Bharath for replying.  But when I add members , I can successfully 
specify a member ip address from a different pool than the subnet when creating 
pool, hence the confusion.  And theoretically, why would members for a pool 
have to belong to the same subnet?

________________________________
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 17:50:16 -0700
From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Why do we need to select subnet 
when creating a pool?

Hi Wanjing,

As it's Juno, I assume you are using LBaaSv1. If that's the case, as Brandon 
pointed, there's no subnet-id switch in the "neutron lb-member-create" command.

Having said that you still use the subnet-id in both the following commands:
neutron lb-pool-create
neutron lb-vip-create

You should note that the subnet id in each of the above commands serve 
different purpose. In the case of "lb-pool-create", the subnet-id is provided 
to make sure that only members belonging to the specified subnet-id could be 
added to the pool.

However, the subnet id in the "lb-vip-create" command specifies the network 
range from which an ip is chosen to be assigned as a vip.

Thus, you could use different subnets for both the above commands and as long 
as you have route between those two, the load balancing works.

Thanks,
Bharath.


On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Brandon Logan 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
​So someone pointed out that you were using lbaas for Juno, which would mean 
you aren't using LBaaS V2.  So you're using V1.  V1 member's do not take 
subnet_id as an attribute.  Let me know how you are making your requests.



Thanks,

Brandon

________________________________
From: Brandon Logan 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 8:40 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List not for usage questions
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Why do we need to select subnet 
when creating a pool?

I'm assuming you are using LBaaS V2.  With that assumption, I'm not sure how 
you are having to select subnet on the pool.  It's not supposed to be a field 
at all on the pool object.  subnet_id is required on the member object right 
now, but that's something I and others think should just be optional, and if 
not specified then it's assumed that member can be reached with whatever has 
already been setup.​  Another option is pool could get a subnet_id field in the 
future and all members that are created without subnet_id are assumed to be on 
the pool's subnet_id, but I'm getting ahead of myself and this has no bearing 
on your current issue.



Could you tell me how you are making your requests? CLI? REST directly?

________________________________
From: Wanjing Xu <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 12:57 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List not for usage questions
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Why do we need to select subnet when 
creating a pool?

So when I use Haproxy for LBaaS for Juno, there is a subnet mandatary field 
that I need to fill in when creating a pool, and later on when I add members, I 
can use a different subnet(or simply just enter the ip of the member), when 
adding vip, I can still select a third subnet.  So what is the usage of the 
first subnet that I used to create pool?  There is no port created for this 
pool subnet.  I can see that a port is created for the vip subnet that the 
loadbalancer instance is binding to.

Regards!

Wanjing Xu

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: 
[email protected]?subject:unsubscribe<http://lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



__________________________________________________________________________ 
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>?subject:unsubscribe
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to