Excerpts from Adam Lawson's message of 2015-05-05 07:01:48 -0700: > Doug, it isn't about me or about trying to add more to the pool of one type > of contributor from a different pool of individuals with a different > skillset or about attempting to make shortcuts to leadership as you so > delicately put it. Frankly I think you're missing the point. When there is > a technical body governing everything of a technical nature within > OpenStack and it consists of members from one slice of the overall > community and candidates speak of engaging the operator community more than > it has in the past as part of the reason folks should vote for them, I > think the candidates are on point and we have an opportunity in front of > us. Has nothing to do with broadening the pool of one specific type of > contributor but about taking advantage of those who are already > contributing in a different way. That's a strength in our community and > when the tc appears to be moving towards technical leadership that paints > with broader multi-discipline strokes, I'm completely on board with that.
Early on in the thread I thought you wanted community members without ATC status to be able to vote for and run for the TC. Maybe I misunderstood what you were saying? Doug __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
