On Jun 1, 2015, at 8:26 AM, Andrew Laski <[email protected]> wrote: >> In any case, even if we wanted to deprecate it (and I think an argument >> could be made for that) we still have to decide what the "correct" behaviour >> should be for the API as it exists today. In my view the current behaviour >> doesn't match what a reasonable person would expect given the description of >> the "min count" and "max count" parameters. > > I'm +1 on fixing the behavior here. As many instances as can be booted > should be, despite part of the initial block failing. The only reason I can > think of for failing all of them is if you want to consider the request as a > single operation that can either fail or succeed.
Even in that case, "succeed" would mean that you were able to create min_count instances. If that isn't what was wanted, then the min_count should be the same as the max_count. -- Ed Leafe
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
