On 28 May 2015 at 15:55, Jim Rollenhagen <j...@jimrollenhagen.com> wrote:
> ... > I also put an informational spec about this change up in the > ironic-specs repo: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/185171/. My goal was > to discuss this in the spec, but the mailing list is fine too. There are > some unanswered questions in that review that we should make sure we > cover. > > I'm really excited about this, and hope it can lead to good outcomes for > the rest of OpenStack in the future. :) > > // jim > > Hi Jim, thanks for the spec! It'll be good to incorporate the feedback from this thread, into the spec. To be honest, I'm apprehensive and worried about this. As Devananda mentioned, the devil is in the details. I hope we get enough of the details right, so that we aren't spending time wondering about the process instead of doing coding and reviewing. My main concern is that with my reviewer's hat on, I don't feel like it will help me much. We are proposing more (smaller) releases, and as long as people know that there is an upcoming release planned, they will try to get their patches merged. So I think we're just spreading out the 'please review my patch' requests, but at least I won't feel so bad now when I say no, because they won't have to wait 6+ months to land their feature :) Anyway, I'm open to this (or am I, maybe I'm just resigned to it cause the train seems to be leaving), and hope to be pleasantly surprised ;) --ruby
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
