On Jun 3, 2015, at 9:37 AM, Daniel P. Berrange <[email protected]> wrote:
> If this doesn't match semver, then don't call it semvar versioning. > We should do what's right for the nova project, rather than try to > fit with an arbitrary set of versioning rules defined elsewhere. Semver is hardly "arbitrary"; it's well thought out and widely understood. I haven't heard a reason *why* nova can't work with semver, only that a few proposed version schemes don't follow semver. -- Ed Leafe
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
