On 06/03/2015 05:45 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
On Jun 3, 2015, at 9:37 AM, Daniel P. Berrange <berra...@redhat.com> wrote:
If this doesn't match semver, then don't call it semvar versioning. We
should do what's right for the nova project, rather than try to fit with an
arbitrary set of versioning rules defined elsewhere.
Semver is hardly "arbitrary"; it's well thought out and widely understood. I
haven't heard a reason *why* nova can't work with semver, only that a few
proposed version schemes don't follow semver.
Agreed. If it means we bump the major version every release due to removing
deprecated stuff then so be it.
Chris
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
