Chris Friesen said on Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 10:57:54PM -0600:
> On 06/04/2015 05:23 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
> > I have personally been using:
> >
> > Implements: partial-blueprint x
> >
> >but I don't actually care much. I would also be fine with:
> >
> > Partially-Implements: blueprint x
>
> If we need one, second one gets my vote.
>
> I'm not sure we actually need one though. Do we really care about
> the distinction between a commit that fully implements a blueprint
> and one that partially implements it? I'd expect that most
> blueprints require multiple commits, and so "blueprint X" could
> implicitly be assumed to be a partial implementation in the common
> case.
We need something that looks like a tag to prevent hits on "blueprint
blah suggested this but I'm doing something else".
Call me crazy but this seems the obvious:
Blueprint: xyzzy
Alexis
--
Nova Engineer, HP Cloud. AKA lealexis, lxsli.
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
