On 6 June 2015 at 08:53, Joshua Harlow <[email protected]> wrote: > Hopefully it's somewhat obvious to folks that altering the PBR version > schema (yet again), breaks *all the people* from using it in a reliable > manner, and if the goal of PBR is to bring reasonableness, well changing it > in a way that breaks things seems like the-anti-pattern of PBR. > > I know from building with anvil and building RPMs that we only used tags in > https://github.com/stackforge/anvil/tree/master/conf/origins because the PBR > version number would change format/style/other (and also partially because > nothing existed that converted to a *sane* rpm version string, although this > supposedly exists now via a new PBR function).
Well is has the thing you collaborated on. Whether thats sane, an RPM person needs to say :) -Rob -- Robert Collins <[email protected]> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
