Robert Collins wrote:
On 6 June 2015 at 08:53, Joshua Harlow<harlo...@outlook.com> wrote:
Hopefully it's somewhat obvious to folks that altering the PBR version
schema (yet again), breaks *all the people* from using it in a reliable
manner, and if the goal of PBR is to bring reasonableness, well changing it
in a way that breaks things seems like the-anti-pattern of PBR.
I know from building with anvil and building RPMs that we only used tags in
https://github.com/stackforge/anvil/tree/master/conf/origins because the PBR
version number would change format/style/other (and also partially because
nothing existed that converted to a *sane* rpm version string, although this
supposedly exists now via a new PBR function).
Well is has the thing you collaborated on. Whether thats sane, an RPM
person needs to say :)
Sanity is in the eye of the beholder so +1 from me, hopefully not to
insane, ha :-P
-Rob
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
