On 06/16/2015 12:41 PM, Allison Randal wrote:
On 06/15/2015 01:43 PM, Paul Belanger wrote:
While I agree those points are valid, and going to be helpful, moving
under OpenStack (even Stackforge) does also offer the chance to get more
test integration upstream (not saying this was the original scope).
However, this could also be achieved by 3rd party integration too.
Nod, 3rd party integration is worth exploring.
I'm still driving forward with some -infra specific packaging for Debian
/ Fedora ATM (zuul packaging). Mostly because of -infra needs for
packages. Not saying that is a reason to reconsider, but there is the
need for -infra to consume packages from upstream.
I suspect that, at least initially, the needs of -infra specific
packaging will be quite different than the needs of general-purpose
packaging in Debian/Fedora distros. Trying to tightly couple the two
will just bog you down in trying to solve far too many problems for far
too many people. But, I also suspect that -infra packaging will be quite
minimal and intended for the services to be configured by puppet, so
there's a very good chance that if you sprint ahead and just do it, your
style of packaging will end up feeding back into future packaging in the
distros.
My thoughts exactly. I believe by the next summit, we should have a base
in -infra for producing packages (unsure about consuming ATM).
Interesting times ahead.
Allison
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
