On 06/15/2015 01:43 PM, Paul Belanger wrote: > While I agree those points are valid, and going to be helpful, moving > under OpenStack (even Stackforge) does also offer the chance to get more > test integration upstream (not saying this was the original scope). > However, this could also be achieved by 3rd party integration too.
Nod, 3rd party integration is worth exploring. > I'm still driving forward with some -infra specific packaging for Debian > / Fedora ATM (zuul packaging). Mostly because of -infra needs for > packages. Not saying that is a reason to reconsider, but there is the > need for -infra to consume packages from upstream. I suspect that, at least initially, the needs of -infra specific packaging will be quite different than the needs of general-purpose packaging in Debian/Fedora distros. Trying to tightly couple the two will just bog you down in trying to solve far too many problems for far too many people. But, I also suspect that -infra packaging will be quite minimal and intended for the services to be configured by puppet, so there's a very good chance that if you sprint ahead and just do it, your style of packaging will end up feeding back into future packaging in the distros. Allison __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
