Zane, I will fix this (and the other GBP packages) as soon as I possibly
can. I agree it would be better to move the GBP heat support into the
heat repo, either main tree or /contrib, but others on the GBP team
would most likely handle that. Seem reasonable for liberty.
Thanks,
-Bob
On 6/17/15 8:56 AM, Zane Bitter wrote:
Every day I get an email about broken dependencies for the group-based
policy Heat plugin in Fedora (openstack-heat-gbp), because the version
of Heat it depends on is capped. Two points:
1) Would whoever maintains that package (Bob?) please fix it :)
2) Why was this plugin not submitted to /contrib in the Heat repo so
that it could be continuously tested & maintained against the Heat
code base, thus avoiding any compatibility problems with future
versions? This is the entire reason we have /contrib. In fact, if you
think the resources are in close to their final form (i.e. the API is
not super experimental still), I think we may even be willing to
accept them into the main tree at this point.
cheers,
Zane.
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
[email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
