On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Duncan Thomas <duncan.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We need mutual exclusion for several operations. Whether that is done by > entity queues, locks, state based locking at the api later, or something > else, we need mutual exclusion. > > Our current api does not lend itself to looser consistency, and I struggle > to come up with a sane api that does - nobody doing an operation on a > volume wants it to happen maybe, at some time... > What about deletes? They can happen later on, which can help in these situations I think. -- *Avishay Traeger* *Storage R&D* Mobile: +972 54 447 1475 E-mail: avis...@stratoscale.com Web <http://www.stratoscale.com/> | Blog <http://www.stratoscale.com/blog/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/Stratoscale> | Google+ <https://plus.google.com/u/1/b/108421603458396133912/108421603458396133912/posts> | Linkedin <https://www.linkedin.com/company/stratoscale>
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
