Excerpts from Ed Leafe's message of 2015-07-19 18:37:49 -0500: > On Jul 16, 2015, at 4:13 AM, Thierry Carrez <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I don't really like the idea of a popularity contest to define "HA" or > > "scales" -- anyone with a stake in the game and their cat will upvote or > > downvote for no reason. I prefer to define HA in clear terms and have > > some group maintain the tag across the set of projects. > > Hmmm… I was thinking of concepts like restaurant or movie reviews: since > those depend on the tastes of the reviewer, they may or may not match your > tastes. So we might consider tags that are backed by different groups of > operators, each of whom may have a completely different environment. New > operators coming into OpenStack will soon recognize which tags are relevant > to their environment, and give them much more credence when it comes to > evaluating the state of the various projects. > > -- Ed Leafe
The operator community is working on another set of tag definitions in the ops-tags-team repository [1] that sounds a bit closer to what you're describing. Doug [1] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/stackforge/ops-tags-team/ __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
