On 07/15/2015 03:27 PM, John Griffith wrote:
It's relatively limited right now I think, and part of the reason for that is we've tried to ensure that the information that we put on tags is subjective
I think you mean "objective" here, and throughout this, not "subjective". We try as much as possible for the tag definitions to have a clear list of requirements -- preferably driven by some data source like a script that queries stackalytics -- that can be used in applying the tag to a project.
>, and at the same time doesn't give any false impression
that something is "good" or "bad". We just wanted to have tags to easily convey some general information about a project to help people gain at least a little insight into a project, how it's managed, what sort of community is contributing to it etc. As we move into things like the "compute starter kit" it gets a bit less subjective, but not really too much.
It got a bit *more* subjective, not less subjective :) Or perhaps you meant "prescriptive"?
Best, -jay __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
