On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 7:42 PM, John Griffith <john.griffi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Robert Collins <robe...@robertcollins.net > > wrote: > >> On 19 August 2015 at 03:51, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> wrote: >> >> > So... I'm at Linux Con this week, meaning that things will be slow. I >> > think - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/208582/ (slightly updated this >> > morning) will get devstack users working again. And I agree, we really >> > need devstack and the gate to be convergent on their solution here, not >> > divergent. >> >> So unless something has changed, devstack users are broken only on >> Fedora - and the constraints thing won't protect them at this stage >> because of two things. >> >> Firstly, the bug isn't a cryptography bug - its a setuptools / pip >> thing resulting in the .so pip installs being in the arch neutral path >> rather than lib64, and this would work except that devstack also >> installs python-cffi, which then masks the pip updated one. I don't >> know why devstack is installing the binary package :/. This is a >> Fedora platform specific bug - it doesn't show up on Ubuntu - either >> because devstack doesn't install the ubuntu python-cffi package, or >> because pip/setuptools on ubuntu don't have the same disconnect with >> system packages in the same way. I'm not sure which. >> >> Secondly, until we have a gate on openstack/requirements that checks >> devstack-on-fedora, fedora developers will be exposed to this sort of >> thing from time to time :/. >> >> -Rob >> >> -- >> Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> >> Distinguished Technologist >> HP Converged Cloud >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: >> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > Catching up on this thread, looks like the referenced devstk change above > (987dc6453e8e3a8a46d748059378564c42bafc5c) merged and broke things. Seems > we don't install opt/stack/requirements so stack.sh is failing for third > party CI's that don't use node-pool (suspect they'll fail when they're > nodes are rebuilt similar to last weeks issue with keystone). > > Went ahead and confirmed that a fresh download and stack.sh locally fails, > going to have a look after dinner but thought maybe somebody already knows > what's up with this. > > Thanks, > John > > For those that are interested, Clark pointed me to this patch [1] which in fact the addresses the issue I was running in to. [1]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/214409/ Thanks, John
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
