On 08/18/2015 09:34 PM, John Griffith wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 7:42 PM, John Griffith <john.griffi...@gmail.com > <mailto:john.griffi...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Robert Collins > <robe...@robertcollins.net <mailto:robe...@robertcollins.net>> wrote: > > On 19 August 2015 at 03:51, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net > <mailto:s...@dague.net>> wrote: > > > So... I'm at Linux Con this week, meaning that things will be slow. > I > > think - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/208582/ (slightly updated > this > > morning) will get devstack users working again. And I agree, we > really > > need devstack and the gate to be convergent on their solution here, > not > > divergent. > > So unless something has changed, devstack users are broken only on > Fedora - and the constraints thing won't protect them at this stage > because of two things. > > Firstly, the bug isn't a cryptography bug - its a setuptools / pip > thing resulting in the .so pip installs being in the arch > neutral path > rather than lib64, and this would work except that devstack also > installs python-cffi, which then masks the pip updated one. I don't > know why devstack is installing the binary package :/. This is a > Fedora platform specific bug - it doesn't show up on Ubuntu - either > because devstack doesn't install the ubuntu python-cffi package, or > because pip/setuptools on ubuntu don't have the same disconnect with > system packages in the same way. I'm not sure which. > > Secondly, until we have a gate on openstack/requirements that checks > devstack-on-fedora, fedora developers will be exposed to this > sort of > thing from time to time :/. > > -Rob > > -- > Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com <mailto:rbtcoll...@hp.com>> > Distinguished Technologist > HP Converged Cloud > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > <http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > Catching up on this thread, looks like the referenced devstk change > above (987dc6453e8e3a8a46d748059378564c42bafc5c) merged and broke > things. Seems we don't install opt/stack/requirements so stack.sh > is failing for third party CI's that don't use node-pool (suspect > they'll fail when they're nodes are rebuilt similar to last weeks > issue with keystone). > > Went ahead and confirmed that a fresh download and stack.sh locally > fails, going to have a look after dinner but thought maybe somebody > already knows what's up with this. > > Thanks, > John > > For those that are interested, Clark pointed me to this patch [1] which > in fact the addresses the issue I was running in to. > > [1]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/214409/
Sorry about jumping the gun there. We thought, incorrectly, we had the
right fix. And it's a conference week so access to my local test env
wasn't easy.
I've got a few ideas on how to robustify this whole path to make issues
like this less likely to happen in the future.
My bad.
-Sean
--
Sean Dague
http://dague.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
