On 08/19/2015 06:42 PM, Derek Higgins wrote:
On 06/08/15 15:01, Dougal Matthews wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Prince" <[email protected]>
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
<[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, 6 August, 2015 1:12:42 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Moving instack upstream
<snip>
I would really like to see us rename python-rdomanager-oscplugin. I
think any project having the name "RDO" in it probably doesn't belong
under TripleO proper. Looking at the project there are some distro
specific things... but those are fairly encapsulated (or could be made
so fairly easily).
I agree, it made sense as it was the entrypoint to RDO-Manager. However,
it could easily be called the python-tripleo-oscplugin or similar. The
changes would be really trivial, I can only think of one area that
may be distro specific.
I'm putting the commit together now to pull these repositories into
upstream tripleo are we happy with the name "python-tripleo-oscplugin" ?
Do we really need this "oscplugin" postfix? It may be clear for some of
us, but I don't that our users know that OSC means OpenStackClient, and
that oscplugin designates "something that adds features to openstack
command". Can't we just call it python-tripleo? or maybe even just
"tripleo"?
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
