Excerpts from Derek Higgins's message of 2015-07-21 19:29:49 +0000: > Hi All, > Something we discussed at the summit was to switch the focus of > tripleo's deployment method to deploy using instack using images built > with tripleo-puppet-elements. Up to now all the instack work has been > done downstream of tripleo as part of rdo. Having parts of our > deployment story outside of upstream gives us problems mainly because it > becomes very difficult to CI what we expect deployers to use while we're > developing the upstream parts. > > Essentially what I'm talking about here is pulling instack-undercloud > upstream along with a few of its dependency projects (instack, > tripleo-common, tuskar-ui-extras etc..) into tripleo and using them in > our CI in place of devtest. > > Getting our CI working with instack is close to working but has taken > longer then I expected because of various complications and distractions > but I hope to have something over the next few days that we can use to > replace devtest in CI, in a lot of ways this will start out by taking a > step backwards but we should finish up in a better place where we will > be developing (and running CI on) what we expect deployers to use. > > Once I have something that works I think it makes sense to drop the jobs > undercloud-precise-nonha and overcloud-precise-nonha, while switching > overcloud-f21-nonha to use instack, this has a few effects that need to > be called out > > 1. We will no longer be running CI on (and as a result not supporting) > most of the the bash based elements > 2. We will no longer be running CI on (and as a result not supporting) > ubuntu
I'd like to point out that this means DIB will no longer have an image booting test for Ubuntu. I have created a review[1] to try and get some coverage of this in a dib speific test, hopefully we can get it merged before we remove the tripleo ubuntu tests? > > Should anybody come along in the future interested in either of these > things (and prepared to put the time in) we can pick them back up again. > In fact the move to puppet element based images should mean we can more > easily add in extra distros in the future. > > 3. While we find our feet we should remove all tripleo-ci jobs from non > tripleo projects, once we're confident with it we can explore adding our > jobs back into other projects again I assume DIB will be keeping the tripleo jobs for now? > > Nothing has changed yet, I order to check we're all on the same page > this is high level details of how I see things should proceed so shout > now if I got anything wrong or you disagree. > > Sorry for not sending this out sooner for those of you who weren't at > the summit, > Derek. > -Greg [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/204639/ __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
