On 18 August 2015 at 17:13, Ruby Loo <rlooya...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 18 August 2015 at 13:08, Lucas Alvares Gomes <lucasago...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> HI >> >> > Hi, I'd like to make sure I understand. Is it the case that ideally, >> if we > > > could go back in time, we'd like to change the client so it defaults to >> 1.1? >> >> AFAIUI, yes >> >> > But since we can't, the next client that we ship/release will have the >> most >> > reasonable oldest version? If so, then since the most recent client >> shipped >> > is at 1.6, then I think we should put it back to 1.6 even though it is >> 1.9 >> > on master. Regardless of whether there are no backwards incompatible >> changes >> > between 1.6 & 1.9 -- because we need to stick to some >> way-of-doing-things, >> > and if we use 1.9, I suspect it will be confusing. At least 1.6 was >> what we >> > had at the end of kilo. >> > >> >> The reason why I think we should release with 1.9 is because: >> >> 1) It's already on master and people may be using it already >> >> 2) It's compatible with the previous version that has been released >> already (1.6). >> >> So it won't break neither users that just get it from pip nor users >> that clone the git repository. >> > > The order of my preference is 1.1 (which is unrealistic as I mention > below), 1.6 (because that's what the client had in kilo release and is the > 'closest' version to the server's 1.1), then 1.9 for the reasons you > mentioned above, then 1.10 just cuz it is the last version that is > backwards compatible :-) > > Devananda has a patch[0] that changes the client to 1.6, but the > reviewers' comments there point to the mailing list (here) wrt deciding > what it should be so what do other folks think? > >> >> In case we don't resolve this via email, I added this topic (which default version should the client use) to our next meeting's agenda.
cheers, --ruby
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev