there was another patch [1] fix the invalid CIDR for subnet. thanks, hanzhang, shi
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/201942/ At 2015-08-22 03:33:26, "Jay Pipes" <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote: >On 08/21/2015 02:34 PM, Sean M. Collins wrote: >> So - the tl;dr is that I don't think that we should accept inputs like >> the following: >> >> x -> 192 >> x/y -> 10/8 >> x.x/y -> 192.168/16 >> x.x.x/y -> 192.168.0/24 >> >> which are equivalent to:: >> >> x.0.0.0/y -> 192.0.0.0/24 >> x.0.0.0/y -> 10.0.0.0/8 >> x.x.0.0/y -> 192.168.0.0/16 >> x.x.x.0/y -> 192.168.0.0/24 > >Agreed completely. > >Best, >-jay > >__________________________________________________________________________ >OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
