Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote: > Operational overhead has a cost - maintaining 3 different database > tools, backing them up, providing HA, etc. has operational cost. > > This is not to say that this cannot be overseen, but it should be taken > into consideration. > > And *if* they can be consolidated into an agreed solution across the > whole of OpenStack - that would be highly beneficial (IMHO).
Agreed, and that ties into the similar discussion we recently had about picking a common DLM. Ideally we'd only add *one* general dependency and use it for locks / leader election / syncing status around. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
