On 10/08/2015 09:01 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote:
Operational overhead has a cost - maintaining 3 different database
tools, backing them up, providing HA, etc. has operational cost.
This is not to say that this cannot be overseen, but it should be taken
into consideration.
And *if* they can be consolidated into an agreed solution across the
whole of OpenStack - that would be highly beneficial (IMHO).
Agreed, and that ties into the similar discussion we recently had about
picking a common DLM. Ideally we'd only add *one* general dependency and
use it for locks / leader election / syncing status around.
++
All of the proposed DLM tools can fill this space successfully. There is
definitely not a need for multiple.
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
