On 11/13/2015 01:16 PM, Sean M. Collins wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 07:42:12AM EST, Sean Dague wrote: >> Ok, I top responded with the details of the job, honestly I think it's >> just a project-config change to get up and running, and then hacking at >> the bugs that fall out. > > Thanks - that was super helpful. > > I'm thinking of working on the following on Monday: > > 1) capture that somewhere in the upgrade docs we're putting together in > neutron's devref > > 2) Adding the stanza to project-config to get grenade running for > Neutron > > 3) Take a look at the patches that Armando linked a couple emails back > in this thread.
I don't think that any of the patches listed there are needed. This was part of the reason I -2ed that direction in the last cycle. It required a separate special code path for partial upgrade setup which was very synthetic (and honestly kind of confusing to debug). The new approach means if you did upgrade for the all-in-one case, and you did multinode setup with worker processes on the subnode, you just make a config where you do them both at the same time, and you have partial upgrade. -Sean -- Sean Dague http://dague.net __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev