Chunked Encoding is a bad idea with mod_wsgi in general. While enabling it like that is fine, you are not guaranteed to get 100% consistent results simply because the wsgi spec did not/does not support it. Not all versions of mod_wsgi can enable it.
So, in short, officially keystone does not support chunked encoding. If radosgw cannot work without it, it is a bug against radosgw or something RDO itself is doing with radosgw. --morgan On Dec 2, 2015 23:00, "Adam Young" <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/01/2015 03:50 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: > >> I just upgraded to keystone liberty for one of my production clouds, and >> went with apache since eventlet was listed as deprecated. It was pretty >> easy. Just ran into one issue. RadosGW wouldn't work against it until I >> added "WSGIChunkedRequest On'" in the config. otherwise, the config as >> shipped with RDO worked fine. I am running giant radosgw, so future >> versions may not require that. >> > > Thanks for the note. Should this be bug? > > >> Thanks, >> Kevin >> ________________________________________ >> From: Sean Dague [[email protected]] >> Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 4:05 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [keystone] Removing >> functionality that was deprecated in Kilo and upcoming deprecated >> functionality in Mitaka >> >> On 12/01/2015 01:57 AM, Steve Martinelli wrote: >> >>> Trying to summarize here... >>> >>> - There isn't much interest in keeping eventlet around. >>> - Folks are OK with running keystone in a WSGI server, but feel they are >>> constrained by Apache. >>> >> From an interop perspective, this concerns me a bit. My understanding is >> that Apache is specifically needed for Federation. Federation is the >> norm that we want for environments in the future. >> >> I'd hate to go down a path where the reference architecture we put out >> there doesn't support this. It's going to be all the pain of cells / >> non-cells that Nova's or nova-net / neutron bifurcation. >> >> Whatever the reference architecture is, it should support Federation. A >> non federation capable keystone should be the exception. >> >> - uWSGI could help to support multiple web servers. >>> >> >> -- >> Sean Dague >> http://dague.net >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: >> [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: >> [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
