On 12/03/2015 07:51 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
Chunked Encoding is a bad idea with mod_wsgi in general. While
enabling it like that is fine, you are not guaranteed to get 100%
consistent results simply because the wsgi spec did not/does not
support it. Not all versions of mod_wsgi can enable it.
So, in short, officially keystone does not support chunked encoding.
If radosgw cannot work without it, it is a bug against radosgw or
something RDO itself is doing with radosgw.
RDO is not doing Keystone in HTTPD by default yet, and I have not come
across the radosgw module at all. Didn't think it was a real issue, but
want to track if it is.
--morgan
On Dec 2, 2015 23:00, "Adam Young" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 12/01/2015 03:50 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
I just upgraded to keystone liberty for one of my production
clouds, and went with apache since eventlet was listed as
deprecated. It was pretty easy. Just ran into one issue.
RadosGW wouldn't work against it until I added
"WSGIChunkedRequest On'" in the config. otherwise, the config
as shipped with RDO worked fine. I am running giant radosgw,
so future versions may not require that.
Thanks for the note. Should this be bug?
Thanks,
Kevin
________________________________________
From: Sean Dague [[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 4:05 AM
To: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [keystone]
Removing functionality that was deprecated in Kilo and
upcoming deprecated functionality in Mitaka
On 12/01/2015 01:57 AM, Steve Martinelli wrote:
Trying to summarize here...
- There isn't much interest in keeping eventlet around.
- Folks are OK with running keystone in a WSGI server, but
feel they are
constrained by Apache.
From an interop perspective, this concerns me a bit. My
understanding is
that Apache is specifically needed for Federation. Federation
is the
norm that we want for environments in the future.
I'd hate to go down a path where the reference architecture we
put out
there doesn't support this. It's going to be all the pain of
cells /
non-cells that Nova's or nova-net / neutron bifurcation.
Whatever the reference architecture is, it should support
Federation. A
non federation capable keystone should be the exception.
- uWSGI could help to support multiple web servers.
--
Sean Dague
http://dague.net
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
[email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
<http://[email protected]?subject:unsubscribe>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
[email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
<http://[email protected]?subject:unsubscribe>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
[email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
<http://[email protected]?subject:unsubscribe>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
