Thanks Yamamoto. Yes, agree it makes sense to keep it in the TaaS tree. Would be great though to have broader audience come and review it.
Seems like there is not much activity. I can go ahead and take a stab at reviving it [1] and then we can iterate over and improve. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96149/ Thanks, Fawad Khaliq On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Takashi Yamamoto <[email protected]> wrote: > hi, > > On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 2:02 AM, Fawad Khaliq <[email protected]> wrote: > > Folks, > > > > Any plan to revive this [1] so we can discuss and finalize the use cases > and > > APIs. > > > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96149/ > > i think Anil will explain the history of the project. > > i suspect neutron-spec isn't appropriate place for us anymore. > we can have subproject spec as other projects have. [2] > > [2] eg. https://github.com/openstack/networking-midonet/tree/master/specs > > > > > Thanks, > > Fawad Khaliq > > > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Unsubscribe: > [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
