#2 makes more sense. Ghe Rivero
Quoting Flavio Percoco (2016-01-08 14:06:28) > Greetings, > > As some of you know already, google code is going to be shutdown. Some > projects we're using are hosted and, unfortunately, some of them are > unmaintained and perhaps going away. > > One of these projects is PrettyTable. This point was raised by Erno in > this patch[0] from jd__. PrettyTable is not just being used in several > openstack specific projects but it's also a transitive dependency for > all client libraries using cliff. > > With all that in mind, I've contacted the author of the library and > asked him if it'd be ok for us (OpenStack) to adopt this library. The > author accepted and granted me access to the project on pypi. > > I'm saying all the above because we now need to find a home for it in > OpenStack. > > I've identified 2 possible places: > > 1) Oslo, as we maintaing cross-project libraries and some of them are > not in the oslo namespace > > 2) OpenStack Client team as they maintain cliff already and it'd > perhaps make more sense to have this library there. > > One thing to note is that this library has been quite stable, which > means it won't, hopefully, add too much work to the team. > > Thoughts? > > [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/234340/ > > -- > @flaper87 > Flavio Percoco > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev