On 20 January 2016 at 08:20, Edgar Magana <[email protected]> wrote:
> Just providing support for Kyle’s proposal! > It is working very well for other teams such as nova, docs between others. > At risk of stating the obvious, not every project is equal, and as I mentioned in an earlier response, I have always been skeptical of the double schedule because a) numbers haven't proven the overwhelming attendance and b) the agenda is set on a weekly basis and certain topics are only discussed during one of the meetings. That said, I welcome anyone willing to step up and co-chair the Tuesday meetings. Feel free to post a patch on irc-meetings and I'd be happy to bless it. Cheers, Armando > Edgar > > > > > On 1/20/16, 3:55 AM, "Rossella Sblendido" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > >On 01/19/2016 05:14 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > >> Rossella Sblendido <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> On 01/19/2016 04:36 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote: > >>>> Thinking of this, I had another idea, a bit raw yet. > >>>> > >>>> But how does it sound to have two meetings a week, one in a EU/ASIA > >>>> friendlier > >>>> timezone, and another for USA/AU (current one), with different chairs. > >>>> > >>>> We don't impose unnatural-working hours (too early, too late for > >>>> family, etc..) > >>>> to anyone, we encourage gathering as a community (may be split by > >>>> timezones, but > >>>> it feels more human and faster than ML conversations..) and also > >>>> people able > >>>> to make to both, could serve as bridges for both meetings. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Thoughts? > >>> > >>> I think that is what Kyle was proposing and if I am not wrong that's > >>> what they do in nova. > >> > >> My understanding is that Kyle proposed to switch back to bi-weekly > >> alternating meetings, and have a separate chair for each. > > > >You are right Ihar, I misread. I like Kyle's proposal better too. > > > >Rossella > > > >> > >> I think Kyle’s suggestion is wiser since it won’t leave the community > >> split into two separate parts, and it won’t waste two hours each week > >> where we could make it with just one. > >> > >> Ihar > >> > >> > __________________________________________________________________________ > >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > >> Unsubscribe: > [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > >__________________________________________________________________________ > >OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > >Unsubscribe: > [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
