+1 for Kyles proposal as well! I think we can give it a try. If we realize that it becomes kind of a "second class" meeting, as only less people will join or that the meeting has no impact, we still can go back to the weekly meeting slot on Monday IMO.
Andreas (IRC: scheuran) On Mi, 2016-01-20 at 10:29 +0530, Vikram Choudhary wrote: > +1 for Kyle's suggestion > > > Thanks > Vikram > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:40 AM, Martin Hickey > <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > +1 for me on Kyle's suggestion. > > Regards, > Martin > > Inactive hide details for Kyle Mestery ---19/01/2016 > 16:39:05---On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka > <ihrachys@redKyle Mestery ---19/01/2016 16:39:05---On Tue, Jan > 19, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka <[email protected]> > wrote: > Rossella Sblendido > > From: Kyle Mestery <[email protected]> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage > questions)" <[email protected]> > Date: 19/01/2016 16:39 > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Team meeting on Tuesday > 1400UTC > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Rossella Sblendido <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On 01/19/2016 04:36 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote: > >>> > >>> Thinking of this, I had another idea, a bit raw yet. > >>> > >>> But how does it sound to have two meetings a week, one in > a EU/ASIA > >>> friendlier > >>> timezone, and another for USA/AU (current one), with > different chairs. > >>> > >>> We don't impose unnatural-working hours (too early, too > late for family, > >>> etc..) > >>> to anyone, we encourage gathering as a community (may be > split by > >>> timezones, but > >>> it feels more human and faster than ML conversations..) > and also people > >>> able > >>> to make to both, could serve as bridges for both meetings. > >>> > >>> > >>> Thoughts? > >> > >> > >> I think that is what Kyle was proposing and if I am not > wrong that's what > >> they do in nova. > > > > > > My understanding is that Kyle proposed to switch back to > bi-weekly > > alternating meetings, and have a separate chair for each. > > > > I think Kyle’s suggestion is wiser since it won’t leave the > community split > > into two separate parts, and it won’t waste two hours each > week where we > > could make it with just one. > > > Yes, I was proposing two bi-weekly meetings with different > chairs. We > could even have kept the existing schedule and just had a > different > chair for the 1400UTC meeting on Tuesday. > > > Ihar > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Unsubscribe: > [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: > [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: > [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- ----- Andreas (IRC: scheuran) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
