On 02/09/2016 08:05 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Hi, > > TripleO is currently using puppet-pacemaker [1] which is a module hosted > & managed by Github. > The module was created and mainly maintained by Redhat. It tends to > break TripleO quite often since we don't have any gate. > > I propose to move the module to OpenStack so we'll use OpenStack Infra > benefits (Gerrit, Releases, Gating, etc). Another idea would be to gate > the module with TripleO HA jobs. > > The question is, under which umbrella put the module? Puppet ? TripleO ? > > Or no umbrella, like puppet-ceph. <-- I like this idea > > Any feedback is welcome, > > [1] https://github.com/redhat-openstack/puppet-pacemaker
Seems like a module that would be useful outside of TripleO, so it doesn't seem like it should live under that. Other than that I don't have enough knowledge of the organization of the puppet modules to comment.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
